Mingw windows sdk headers

The above also doesn't even scratch the surface of legal that your team might have to delegate to cost even more money so you can figure out what's redistributable and under what terms. My experience with this problem stems from a project I'm working on to develop a codebase using a unified LLVM-based build process. Everything works well enough on Linux and macOS, but on Windows without MinGW it has taken me days to failingly sort through this, and I haven't even gotten into the hiccups that there will inevitably be during linking with LLD.

It's just not worth it to use anything Microsoft unless you're using MSVC, because Microsoft says go all the way or go home, and they put their code where their mouth is with that. One reason might be that every SDK you can download only works on certain Windows versions. You can still download older SDKs that also run on older Windows versions, yet these are missing all the newer features added by later Windows releases. Compared to that mingw64 runs on every Windows from XP SP1 to the latest Windows 10 and it offers all the features that were added in between.

Another reason is that the SDK Microsoft offers can only be installed on only works on a Windows system, yet with mingw you can cross-compile to Windows, that means the system you use to build your Windows executable does not have to be Windows, you can as well build it on a Linux system.

Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. It can be done during the installation process or afterwards with mingw-get. Make sure the pthreads-win32 version you install is 2.

Here is how to fix it: 1. Please specify the type you want to use can be either "mingw32" or "mingw-w64" Please specify mingw32 or mingw-w mingw32 If mingw32 is not installed, please download and install it mingw32 can be downloaded from: www. Unfortunately it only seems to work for bit.

A bit compile crashes. I get errors due to to things like ID3D11Device not being defined etc. May be this is answer. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown.

It must also have no user-defined constructor, destructor, or copy assignment operator. It can have no private or protected non-static data members, and no non-static data members of reference type. It can't have base classes or virtual functions. And, it can only have data members that also meet these requirements. Otherwise, the caller must allocate memory for the return value and pass a pointer to it as the first argument.

The remaining arguments are then shifted one argument to the right. The same pointer must be returned by the callee in RAX. Andoryuuta 25 days ago parent next [—]. You can see this in some of the godbolt links in the linked issue. Ultimately, some COM functions that take no arguments actually end up taking two hidden parameters in rcx and rdx this pointer, and the return struct pointer respectively.

Following comments on Github also point this out. Windows uses its own calling convention. I'm sure COM win32 headers have no shortage or atrocities, but this post here is just saying that GCC doesn't implement the Windows calling convention for struct returns, while clang does.

As someone who has to deal from time to time with code that is a mix of old COM components and newer mingw dependencies I found this discussion fascinating.

I wonder why zig can't do the same but I guess they want calls to directx etc to match what's documented instead of going through c like contortions. Does this offer a reasonable replacement for MinGW? I think the MinGW project is very useful, but I simply do not recommend using it. On ELF platforms, relocations can refer to symbols in other libraries during runtime linking. So external symbols can be treated very similarly to internal ones, just with linking done at runtime instead of compile-time.

It can then generate code for referring to the IAT. Instead… the ELF-style pseudo-relocations are used. It will even temporarily change the protection of the relevant pages to be writable.

Check to see if your MinGW program has unexpected imports to kernel IIRC this can also happen if you trigger executable stack by using GCC trampolines, another reason to not use GCC… edit: Please read the replies below, but according to MinGW developers, this only happens in some edge cases; ordinarily, thunks will be used, which do not have this problem.